I never saw the message but checked the archive when i saw Steve's comments.. really, Gonz, I don't need or want explanations, although I appreciate that you feel furthering my education has some merit. I point, I shoot, I see the results. I don't care to know any more at this time. All the math and all the explanations just go over my head. Frankly, I don't understand your latest explanation. Makes no sense to me at all.
Please let it rest. However, I promise that if there's a need or a desire for me to know all this, I'll be sure to ask. Thanks. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Steve Jolly > Gonz wrote: > > Let me try to explain it non-mathematically. > > I still prefer "underexpose and you lose shadow detail" as an > explanation ;-)
