I probably can sharpen it a tad more. Thanks. I try not to oversharpen jpgs "Saved for Web" to avoid pixelating. I'll play with it. Pretty sure I want to print it.
I was really disappointed in the 17-mile drive. Tons and tons and tons of new houses along the drive that seem to have decimated the surrounding pine/etc. forest. Though areas were marked as preserves it seemed to me an awful lot of trees must have come down for building (though many houses build around the trees). Even if trees didn't come down, thinning out the underbrush for building would weaken the surrounding forest and it appeared to have. Parts of it didn't look that healthy to me. I saw it in my teens and I am sure there was once more wildness there. I know why people want to live there, but it made me sad. Later, Marnie Actually, it wasn't a crop. In a message dated 4/26/2006 6:12:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Didn't ever see (notice) the original PAW, so,if I may, let me say I'm taken with this shot. IMO it needs more size and, if it will stand it, a bit more sharpening. Artfully cropped vertical pano of a "Pirouette Pine. Jack Paul, did you notice that "Spell Check" always wants to correct the spelling of your name; "stinkiest"? --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like it. The rich brown color and the twisted branches. It appears > to > be locked in its own embrace. Very nice. > Paul > On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Anyone, no one else has to like it, because I do. :-) > > > > http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/justatree.htm > > > > But comments still welcome. > > > > Marnie aka Doe ;-)
