You first assumed, wrongly, that I was annoyed by the interesting OS discussion. Then you suggest that the messages I quoted were "important to consider regardless whether the meaning of an expression is understood or not."
There's no way you actually read my first message. -Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Life in the Raw Date: Tue May 2, 2006 3:37 pm Size: 731 bytes To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net On May 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > You guys were arguing terminology and semantics, when BOTH of you > knew exactly what the other person meant. You were being > jackasses, and consequently you looked like jackasses. You can see > what posts I am referring to in my message. Terminology and semantics are often important to consider regardless whether the meaning of an expression is understood or not. Whether such discussion is your interest or not is irrelevant, as is your opinion of the dialogue. The dialogue is over so pursuing this as some important controversy seems to reflect more on the person making such assignations than it does on the participants in the dialogue. Godfrey
