Hi Paal Thanks for the "storey" - just had it printed today. Is this really a store from the designers? Or some kind of "cult advertising" (no offence)? It's interesting to read about the choises the designes made. It would be even more intersting to know what went before choosing the actual functions - not just where/how they designed the controles! But why they ruled out certain things E.I. the lversatile bracketing options of the PZ1p. I tend to use more than one stop bracketing. Look at the sundown at Cliffs of Moher at my home page http://jensbladt.freeservers.com I made this by using 1,3 stops between exposures (Z1) - even those pictures were very much the same (exposure wise) even though you can clearly see the difference in shutterspeed. Anyway, I'm going to buy the MS-S befor this year has gone. I wish I could resist - until The MZ-Sn will eventually arrive. Regards Jens > > Fra: Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dato: 2001/08/15 Wed PM 11:37:56 CEST > Til: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Emne: Re: MZ-S Bracketing > > Jens wrote: > > > I just read the Test of MZ-S in Amateur Photography (UK) july edition. The author >said AB could only "reach" one stop to each side. Is that true? > > No. > > > > >It's important to Print photographers that bracketing can be set to, say +1,+2,+3, >right! > > > You can do this with the MZ-S. > > Pål > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > ------------------------------------------------- WebMail fra Tele2 http://www.tele2.dk ------------------------------------------------- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
