On 2006-06-19 10:58, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> That's a reasonable argumentation. But it does lack the proof. ... > > I see absolutely no basis for trying to "prove" anything with this > information unless what you want to do is complain about something. > There is no possibility of proof as there is insufficient information > to base a proof on. Analysis of the product will be the proof of any > assertions, not some "technical document" offered by the marketing > department.
I hoped that there may be other sources which knew better - and I was told from a 3rd party by now that the electronics are a major redesign. That's no real prove for you, but I trust this source. So the improvement of the image quality should be due both to firmware and hardware. > What an "official document" of this nature means is that Pentax > marketing wants to get some attention directed at the new products > and their features. These documents mean next to nothing with regard > to engineering and technical information. "marketing" - "mean next to nothing" - I'm afraid you're right. Martin -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
