The DL has a nice bright viewfinder but based on my, (admittedly short tome), observation somewhat lower contrast than the DS making manual focusing a bit more difficult. The shot buffer in the DS is much larger with a resulting faster response for the second third and even fourth shot in a series.
Ann Sanfedele wrote: >Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > >>Ann, >> >>Consider a DL or, better yet, a good, used DS, use your manual Pentax glass >>on it just as you would an older manual camera. I paid $410.00 for my >>current DS, used, and in beautiful condition from KEH. I mostly have >>K-mount lenses, and they work very well with the DS, and I suppose with a >>DL as well. Bada Bing - a minimal learning curve. >> >>Shel >> >> > > >What is the "better yet" aspect of the DS over the DL , >Shel? >are you talking about $410 just for the body? > >ann > > > > > > >>>[Original Message] >>>From: Ann Sanfedele >>> >>> >>>Do I want a DL? if not, why not? >>> >>>The Pentax glass I have left are only manual lenses - >>> >>> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
