Yes, it is very nice. I'm thinking that the heavily blurred background next to the sharp otter is making you think it is overly sharp. Nice work there!
-- Bruce Friday, June 30, 2006, 6:35:56 PM, you wrote: PS> Nice shot. It's just crisp and contrasty. It doesn't show PS> oversharpening artifacts. Good work. PS> Paul PS> On Jun 30, 2006, at 7:59 PM, David J Brooks wrote: >> From the GFM weekend. >> >> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/otter1.jpg >> >> No sharpening done, but to me looks way over sharpened for some reason. >> >> Nikon D200, 70-200 F2.8 VR, 1.7 Tele >> >> Dave >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
