Op Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:05:04 +0200 schreef Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW: I had always understood the FA 70-200 to be a dog. > Detail in the shirt, arm, hat and guitar is excellent. > So much for that theory! Hi Don, I had the FA70-200 (powerzoom), bought the F70-210 based on it's reputation... Shooting 'casually', I could not find much difference between the two. With the same subject and from a tripod the F70-210 is noticably better, mainly more contrasty and with more saturated colours. If what I got when ebaying the FA is representative, it must be the best value-for-money long zoom out there :( -- Regards, Lucas >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:12 PM >> To: pdml@pdml.net >> Subject: Paw >> >> >> One from the weekend. >> >> istD with FA70-200 and shot in Raw. Converted in PSCS to B&W >> R=80,G=20,B=5. Constant-2. >> Some S/H but only a tweak. >> >> This is the front four of Nuraw Blooze. Guest singer is the guy >> to the right of the guitar >> player. >> >> >> >> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/four.jpg >> >> Not as contrasty as i wanted, but nice enough i think >> >> Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
