Yup, that is more what I was imagining.  Looks good to me.  Nice work!

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 3:11:54 PM, you wrote:

PJA> I do my image prep on a different machine, which is calibrated to give
PJA> good results when printed.  I've just looked at this image on the
PJA> machine I usually read my e-mail on and you're right it is a bit dark.
PJA> I've punched up the brightness and contrast a bit and I'm putting the
PJA> new version on the web in the original location.  You might want to look
PJA> again.

PJA> http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_whatsit.html

PJA> Bruce Dayton wrote:

>>First thing I did was reduce it to PUG dimensions, just to see how it
>>would look among the other PUG photos.  It certainly would have been a
>>good addition to the PUG.  It has an element of familiarity, yet is
>>still somewhat mysterious as to what it is exactly.  It certainly
>>catches your attention and asks to be looked at.  I like it.  The B&W
>>conversions looks ok, but then, I'm not much of an expert on
>>that.  It does seem just a bit dark and heavy handed.
>>
>>Thanks for sharing it.
>>
>>  
>>


PJA> -- 
PJA> When you're worried or in doubt, 
PJA>    Run in circles, (scream and shout).





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to