thank's Pal, that my opinion too !! I decided this week end to get the FA*600f4 and perhaps the FA85f1,4 - (give's more opportunity to be familiar with the MZ-S in short time) Dieter > -----Urspr> üngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Pål Jensen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 17. August 2001 15:57 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: tele photo lens FA 600 f 4 > > Dieter wrote: > > > Thanks for posting all these comments, they're very helpful - I've to decide >between Zeiss 350f4 (for Contax 645) and FA*600f4 with MZ-S. At the moment, it seem >that I've be unfaithful to my favorate label :-)) - (there's no Zeiss 135 tele photo >lens in acordingly cost range) > > > > > I'm using the Pentax 645n system myself, but there really is no alternative to the >35mm system when it comes to super telephotos. I can only guess what a Zeiss 350/4 >for the Contax 645 costs - it won't anyway give you much reach and really is no >alternative for a 600/4. > > > Pål > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
