I understand. I relate to the light areas of reflection that place the surface of the barn and need nothing else. The contrast it provides to 'present' the oat grass, is important to the image. For me, the heavy imposing shape of the barn adds power/drama. Not trying to change your mind, simply telling you what's in mine. Thanks very much for comments.
Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jack, > > This one doesn't grab me. I think it is because of the extreme lack > of detail in the shadow of the barn > > -- > Bruce > > > Sunday, July 16, 2006, 7:43:27 AM, you wrote: > > JD> Marnie's barn (with it's front in shadow) reminded me of this. > JD> Mamiya 6 w/50mm f/4.1L. > JD> Location: Yuba County, Northern California. > > JD> Jack > > JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=132 > > JD> __________________________________________________ > JD> Do You Yahoo!? > JD> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > JD> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
