As was stated by someone else, for the web, you don't really need to
worry about DPI, just the total number of pixels.  I'm not sure what
software you are using to do you sizing/sharpening - but I just set
the final pixel size, and then sharpen.  If you save that as a tiff,
you don't need to worry about compression.  Then do a series of
convert/compressions to jpg to see how small you can make it without
causing problems.  For the most part, you should be able to size to
about 800 pixels on the long edge and be less than 300K and still have
a very good image.

-- 
Bruce


Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 11:41:18 AM, you wrote:

JD> I do it just that way. Some "trys" have failed in the past.
JD> IOW, I'm very insecure. :]]

JD> Jack

JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Why do you have to 'try' an upload?  Are you sizing the image before
>> uploading or is there some software you use to do it all at once?
>> 
>> To do it best you should resize your image to the dimensions you want
>> and then after that, sharpen to taste for that size.  Then save it
>> with the amount of compression you can live with.  Lastly, upload the
>> image to your site.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:52:07 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> JD> Bruce,
>> JD> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge)
>> by
>> JD> saying that I don't have any idea. 
>> JD> I'm going to try a much larger upload. 
>> JD> I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look
>> about it.
>> JD> I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
>> JD> I set the image size, but when attached, it's seriously
>> compressed.(??)
>> JD> How do I estimate the final size?
>> 
>> JD> Jack
>> 
>> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=139
>> 
>> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> >> Hello Jack,
>> >> 
>> >> It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening.  I do like the
>> image.
>> >> I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and
>> almost
>> >> never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
>> >> What level of compression are you using?
>> >> 
>> >> The reason I ask, is because I think this photo will continue to
>> get
>> >> even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Bruce
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
>> >> 
>> >> JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
>> >> 
>> >> JD> Jack
>> >> 
>> >> JD> __________________________________________________
>> >> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
>> around
>> >> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >> PDML@pdml.net
>> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> >> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> JD> __________________________________________________
>> JD> Do You Yahoo!?
>> JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> 


JD> __________________________________________________
JD> Do You Yahoo!?
JD> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
JD> http://mail.yahoo.com 




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to