You miss my point. It was that if a naked picture of an adult is considered 'normal porn' by some, then it's quite easy to see how a naked picture of a child could be considered 'child porn' by some, using the same logic. If a person in a position of authority, thought it was 'child porn', then in their mind a person viewing it would be guilty of said crimes being discussed.
Once again you are writing as if I am making an argument I am not making. Tom C. >From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: RE: PESO - Jump >Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:05:43 +0100 > > > > > If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some > > consider that porn? I > > would suggest so. Now, show naked pictures of children. > > It's just a step > > away. > > > > Tom C. > > > >If you don't know why there's a difference I think you should get some >counselling. > >Regards, >Bob > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
