I have a problem even reading PDML at work, simply because it is not what I´m paid for (and being one of the owners I guess I should be a good example). For that reason a person watching porn at work could loose his job, even here.
Once in a while, when I´ve had to search for things on the web as part of my work, I have stumbled upon porn. Sure, I back off once I see what kind of link it was, but that is a very long way from fearing prosecution because it is kept in the cache on the computer, as some have claimed may happen in the US and Canada. DagT Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 04.32 skrev Bob Sullivan: > Dag, > > Nice photo, but not one for work. > I would be uncomfortable looking at this on my work screen. > > At work, we live by the morals of the combined organization. > In the US, we have had lots of training on being sensitive toward > others, > so as not to offend them for their beliefs or preferences. > So I personally avoid looking at pictures that women could interpret > as somehow seeing them as objects rather than individual people. > > It's not really been a problem except for the guy who went to Thialand > and loaded a bunch of porn onto his company laptop. When he insisted > on playing it at work, one of the neighboring women complained and he > was marched out the door. > > Regards, Bob S. > > On 7/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In a message dated 7/25/2006 3:15:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> writes: >> Sorry it´s the best I can do on such short notice: >> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=65890 >> >> DagT >> ======= >> That's nice, Dag. Makes a nice abstract. And it did have a >> warning. :-) So I >> looked. >> >> The human body is a thing of beauty. >> >> Marnie aka Doe >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
