I know now, I must have been tired last night...

DagT

Den 29. jul. 2006 kl. 04.04 skrev graywolf:

> But you never heard of Albert Einstein, correct?
>
> --  
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
>
>
> DagT wrote:
>> Not really, I should know. I am a patent attorney and former patent
>> examiner/clerk in Norway, and a partner here: http://
>> www.protector.biz/uk/ You´ll find my face somewhere on that cite.
>>
>> ...and just to say somethng about the US patent attorneys:  They have
>> law degrees as well, making them very good at handling conflicts.
>>
>> DagT
>>
>> Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 22.15 skrev Bob W:
>>
>>> Really? You amaze me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>>  Bob
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>>> Behalf Of DagT
>>>> Sent: 28 July 2006 20:51
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> Subject: Re: Talk about crap
>>>>
>>>> Well, actually the Swiss, and the German, are quite good. Fond or
>>>> rules and order.  In Germany they often have Ph. D´s while in  
>>>> the US
>>>> they often have bachelors degrees in their technical field...  .-)
>>>>
>>>> DagT
>>>>
>>>> Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 21.29 skrev Bob W:
>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps he drew it with brakes and intends to put a big sign on
>>> them
>>>>> when he's built it saying "Warning - do not apply brakes. Applying
>>>>> brakes invalidates warranty".
>>>>>
>>>>> That would easily get by the patent clerks, who are
>>>> probably not very
>>>>> good at physics anyway. Especially the Swiss.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>  Bob
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>>>>> Behalf Of graywolf
>>>>>> Sent: 28 July 2006 16:24
>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Talk about crap
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM
>>>>>> machines are
>>>>>> not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without
>>>>>> consideration. Now it is possible some things have been patented
>>>>> that
>>>>>> fall into that category, but the fact that they do has, in that
>>>>> case,
>>>>>> been cleverly concealed by the applicant.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>> DagT
>> http://dag.foto.no
>>
>> Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

DagT
http://dag.foto.no

Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side.




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to