The K10D (or whatever the heck Pentax will be calling it), is reputed to have the Anti Shake system, the K110 does not.
David J Brooks wrote: >This was talked about , on the Nikon D1 BB, when people started >aquiring their 10mp Nikons, D2X and D200, was that camera shake became >more noticable with the jump from 4-10 mp. > >Its not an issue they say if the old shutter rule is applied( keep >shutter at least to lens focal lenght) and or VR lenses used. > >I have noticed nothing out of the ordinary going from 4-10mp but i >tend to use the VR on the 70-200 a lot, and high shutter, so maybe >thats why. > >Just something to keep in mind with the K10D unless you have >investigated this already. >Is the K10D equiped with the IS sensor to, or just the K100D and K110D. > >Dave > >Quoting Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>>>On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:00 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>It reads like a very intelligent test. The Nikon D200 and the Sony >>>>>Alpha >>>>>both get bad marks for noise. The K10D will apparently have the same >>>>>sensor. >>>>> >>>>> >>>My D2h is a lot worse than my D200, which i don't find bad for noise at all. >>>If i have to shoot the D2H over 320 iso, under cloudy skies, its >>>bad. You notice it in the >>>riders face. I >>>have not noticed as that bad on the D200. >>> >>>At Xmas time i took a few indoor baby shots under florecent light >>>at iso 800 and printed >>>an 8x10 for the >>>Mom. It ;looked very good, but then again at iso 1600 in the arena >>>under extremly poor >>>light, it was >>>noticable. But i bet any camera would have been bad with that light. >>> >>>My istD is good for noise. >>> >>>Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>According to tests, all the Pentax bodies have poor noise performance, >>but the comparison is against bodies like the 200D and D50 which are >>essentially noise-free below 1600 and extremely clean at 1600+, not film >>which is grainier than any reasonably current 1.5x sensor camera at a >>given ISO. In the real world, they're good but not stellar. I don't >>expect the 10MP body to be noticably worse for noise than the 6MP >>bodies, but I wouldn't expect much better either. >> >>-Adam >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > > > >Equine Photography in York Region > > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
