Bruce, Like everybody says, #2 is better. I like the way you were able to improve based on the suggestions on the first pix. Foreground grasses focused. Less of the harsh sky. Less confusion in the middle... clearer central tree. More symeric composition, side side. Very nice, now if I could only learn to improve like this... Regards, Bob S.
On 8/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 8/3/2006 10:26:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I went back this morning to see if I could improve the shot a bit. > Slightly different lighting and more DOF. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 28mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/60 sec @ f/11 > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3279.htm > > > Original shot: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3263.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce > ======== > Yes. The lighting is much better, softer, not so harsh. Yup, I like it better. > > Marnie aka Doe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
