Same size actually, the DL was the first Pentax with the 2.5" screen. -Adam
Aaron Reynolds wrote: > The screen on the K110D is bigger, brighter, and has a better viewing angle. > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: K110D - Why bother? > Date: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:19 pm > Size: 749 bytes > To: "PDML" <PDML@pdml.net> > > A friend is looking for an entry level DSLR, and she likes my istDS. We > talked a little about the DL/DL2 and the new (and now available) K110D and > the K100D. Price is a concern for her, so the non-anti-shake body is where > here interest lies. BuyDig has both the DL and the K110D in stock, and, of > course, the DL is quite a bit less expensive than the K110D. > > I don't see much difference between the DL and the K110D. Are there any > features that the K110D that the DL doesn't? I can't find any of > significance. However, my friend is relying on me to help her make the > decision ... any thoughts on the comparison between the two cameras? > > > Shel > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
