It's obvious, however, that Pentax had reason to kill the project. They didn't do it out of spite. Paul On Aug 10, 2006, at 11:31 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 11/08/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Contax N Digital too, as a non-current model. Using the sensor that >> would have been in the MZ-D (Which heartily confirms the sagacity of >> Pentax's choice to kill the project). > > That's a long bow to draw, the issues pertaining to the failure of the > Contax N Digital was far more complex than their choice of sensor. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
