Thanks, Bruce. I view this as your standard, ordinary, "pretty" shot the impact of which increases with size. A scene that neither offends nor excites almost no one.
Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a shot that I would like to see bigger. I'm suspecting that > it is quite striking when viewed like that. It also seems to be a > bit > blown out in the flower - don't know if this is the result of the > scan > or as shot. Anyways, I like it with those two caveats. > > -- > Bruce > > > Friday, August 11, 2006, 5:54:46 PM, you wrote: > > JD> Had a couple of these lily shots ready to put up recently, but > this got > JD> left back. > > JD> Jack > > JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=165 > > JD> Comments welcome. > > > > JD> __________________________________________________ > JD> Do You Yahoo!? > JD> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > JD> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net