Exept that he is wrong abolut the position of the anti aliasing filter...
DagT Den 15. aug. 2006 kl. 18.49 skrev Thibouille: > Something like?? > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=19601839 > > 2006/8/15, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> That fails the "not used on any existing DSLRS" test, though. >> >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 06:15:32AM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> Probably BW out of the camera. I would consider that no big deal, >>> since >>> BW conversion in PhotoShop actually gives one more control over the >>> grayscale than would in-camera conversion. >>> Paul >>> On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:41 AM, Eric Featherstone wrote: >>> >>>> On 15/08/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> Fra: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Tilt and shift sensor. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope -- I don't have a tilt/shift lens for my 6x7. And I >>>>>> don't shoot >>>>>> architecture. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Aaron >>>>> >>>>> Just a guess: The HDR function of Photoshop CS2 built into the >>>>> camera >>>>> as a part of the multiple exposure. >>>>> >>>>> That would improve the dynamic range of the camera, and in >>>>> combination with the SR or a tripod you could be able to >>>>> combine two >>>>> exposures with different ISO settings at one push of the button. >>>> >>>> I think the clue was that it was something that Aaron _does_ get >>>> with >>>> a 6x7 (but not with 35mm). >>>> >>>> Eric. >>>> DagT http://dag.foto.no Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
