I've not used a film faster than 100 ISO, since doing my last wedding in 1993. Used 200 for in-home reception. MF Provia 100F for church.
Jack --- graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, my little digicam goes down to 64 (smaller sensor > elements=lower > ISO range), which is what I use most of the time. Of course it only > goes > up to 400, but combined with the f/1.8 lenses that works OK. High ISO > > and slow lenses have aways bothered me; although I admit it is > cheaper > to build them that way. > > I would gladly trade 200 pages of "features" for decent, easy to use, > > manual focus on the thing though. > > -- > graywolf > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > ----------------------------------- > > > Jack Davis wrote: > > There has, obvious, been a cascade of posts relative to the > upcoming > > K10D. I read a sample here and there and actually followed a couple > > specific subject speculations for awhile. > > Don't know how it could have not received it's share speculation, > but > > if so, I missed it. > > Anyone guessing about the sensitivity range? Specifically, the > lower > > end. 100 iso? 50? > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
