On 8/16/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:22 PM > Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > > >Mark Roberts wrote: > >> John Forbes wrote: > >>> Paul Sorenson wrote: > >>>> Mark Roberts wrote: > >>>>> Kenneth Waller wrote: > >>>>>> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 2006, at 15:59, Cotty wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> I suppose if you have shale reduction in the body, then it > >>>>>>>>> would allow the photographer > >>>>>>>>> to buy a cheaper, slower lens and hand-hold at a slower speed. > >>>>>>>> And it would simplify the task of mining considerably. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> "Shale reduction" indeed! :-) > >>>>>>> That feature is slated to be added with the next firmware revision. > >>>>>> That's very gneiss! > >>>>> I seen this is off to a rocky start. > >>>> > >>>> I took that for granite from the very start. > >>> > >>> Sedimentary, My dear Watson. > >> > >>The pun-hunters are pursuing their quarry again. > > > > Nonsense! I think you've lost your marbles. > > This thread just cracks me up.
That's probably because your stoned. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
