Yes I think Bruce has something here and I see a few low light shots in Aaron's gallery. I put my money on this. Medium format film that can be pushed is an advantage and quite the opposite from resolution. I have pushed film to very high ISO's and miss this adventure with digital..
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:00 AM Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > Having owned a couple of 67's, aside from the resolution, two things > come to mind: > 1) usable high ISO films - I regularly used 3200 Ilford B&W film with > very low grain. So perhaps, a very usable 3200 ISO or 6400 ISO could > be it. > 2) format ratio - the 67 is a bit more square than the 2:3 ratio in > current DSLR's. Not so much crop for 8X10, 11X14, etc. However, this > already exists in the Olympus 4/3rds system. > > So I would lean towards a real high ISO mode that produces usable > results. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 6:26:57 AM, you wrote: > > > AR> On Aug 16, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > >>> You mean, "No grain/noise" is close, but (reduction of) sensor noise >>> isn't. You are confusing me. (But that's the fun part of all this, I'm >>> sure ;-)) > > AR> No, I didn't mean that "no grain/noise" was close. > > AR> -Aaron > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
