Saw it. Excellent. Paul On Aug 16, 2006, at 9:04 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > I sent in a reply to. > > Dave > > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> But Tom, your posts about Pentax are scurrilous lies:-)) >> Paul >> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Actually I perceive his post to be fairly accurate, based on the >>> occcasions >>> I've said anything negative regarding the Pentax product or company. >>> >>> >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, >>> debriefed or >>> numbered." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >>>> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:15:44 -0600 >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Scott Loveless" >>>> Subject: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >>>> >>>> >>>>> There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that >>>>> mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It >>>>> made me >>>>> laugh out loud. Enjoy: >>>>> http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfdd&tag= >>>> >>>> I remember Wigwam. >>>> I don't see anything in my archived sent items that insulted >>>> him, so it >>>> wan't me that peed in his ear. >>>> >>>> William Robb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > Equine Photography in York Region > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
