I've almost never mentioned the MZ-D. It was your countryman that brought it up.
Tom C. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." >From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Turbulent age >Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:53:31 +0100 > >On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:17:41 +0100, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you ask me they should have just waited around and stuck an APS-C > > sensor > > in it and called it good. They would still have produced a 6MP DSLR, > > sure > > maybe a year late. Changing specs on a product before bringing it to > > market > > would not have had the same stigma as never producing it. > >For how many more years are you going to keep coming back to this? Is >there no subject under the sun of more interest? > >John > > > Tom C. > > > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or > > numbered." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >> Subject: Re: Turbulent age > >> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:02:31 -0400 > >> > >> > >> On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Cotty wrote: > >> > >> > <http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/prototypes/MZ-D.html> > >> > > >> > > >> > C'est la vie, uh? > >> > >> Yeah, but did you ever see the pictures it took? It took balls, but > >> killing that thing off was probably the smartest move they made in a > >> decade. > >> > >> -Aaron > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> PDML@pdml.net > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > >-- >Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
