Yes, I see what you mean. I switched to RAW a long time ago and pretty much stick to it. Unless there is a very specific reason to shoot jpg, which, for me, is fairly rare.
-- Bruce Thursday, August 24, 2006, 6:22:11 PM, you wrote: RW> Saturday night at GFM (the June edition) there was a RW> very nice sunset, and several of us repaired to the RW> top of the mountain to photograph it. I was shooting RW> JPG, feeling intimidated my the perceived arcana of RW> RAW conversion. RW> It was a mistake. The colors came out very strangely, RW> with different strangenesses depending on where I set RW> the white balance. Detail wasn't very good, either. RW> This shot was one of the best, and it suffered RW> horribly getting compressed to a web-suitable size: RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4848240 RW> Ist D, FA 16-45, JPG, ISO 400, 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/11. JPG RW> converted to TIFF for editing, then "saved for Web" in RW> PE4. RW> The TIFF looks a lot better than the displayed JPG, RW> but even the original JPG was disappointing. And that RW> is why I now shoot RAW. RW> Rick RW> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW RW> __________________________________________________ RW> Do You Yahoo!? RW> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around RW> http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
