Good. Just to clarify. The back must cover the full 4x5 frame; not a small portion of it. So as not to be picky, let's say it must cover at least 90% of the frame.
Any larger back, say 10x8, would of course also count. And by selling, we mean a single back on sale to the public. Not the unit price for 10,000 to a back manufacturer. John On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:38:13 +0100, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure. But it's a back, not a camera. As long as that is understood, > you're on. > Paul > On Sep 1, 2006, at 7:02 PM, John Forbes wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:29:25 +0100, Paul Stenquist >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Large format digital backs won't always be too expensive. I can see a >>> tiled back of APS-C sensors selling for less than 2K in a couple of >>> years. >> >> Would you be interested in a little wager of $100 on that? >> >> We'll take two years to end at 31/12/2008, and large format to be >> 4x5 or >> above. I think that's fair. Are you on? >> >> John >> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Large format digital cameras have been used by pro shooters for >>>>> many >>>>> years. They tile the image from multiple sensors. They're used in >>>>> conjunction with a computer. >>>> >>>> To expensive to be practical for anyone outside of the very small >>>> group >>>> that you think is the pro shooting world. >>>> >>>> William Robb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
