On 9/6/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In theory I think you could gain 4 stops. One stop is x2 more light, so x2^4 > should translate to 4 stops.
That's quite a lot. I don't find the raw files from *istD to lack much in dynamic range as it is, so an increase of just 2 stops would probably make me a very happy man. > However, that requires a linear intensity response from the sensor and the > same size of the steps. If you just put 16bit within the same dynamic range > that is covered by the 12 bit you may get better nuances but not dynamic > range.... That's understood. :-) I assume the CCD itself, or maybe its surroundig circuitry, has a theoretical maximum dynamic range as well. IIRC, this has been mentioned on PDML recently too, but, alas for my attention...:-( Since there are so many factors to limit the theoretical potential, I suppose there will be some increase with diminishing returns going on. -That expanding the colour depth to 16 bits doesn't pay back for the effort and cost, to put it in veeery general terms... Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net