The LX will probably outlive you - but if you think you need a back-up the plain ME
seems to me to be the most reliable - nothing much to go wrong (on mine the light
meter was adjusted after 20 years) and batteries last very, very long (on Winder ME
II too). MX seems to be not that reliable and the buttons on ME Super can give
trouble.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Skofteland, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 29. elokuuta 2001 14:36
Aihe: RE: MZ-S vs. LX
>You guys are starting to worry me!
>
>I just bought my first LX and have put only a few rolls through it so far.
>How much life can I expect from this camera? Let's put it this way: I don't
>intend to replace it! And honestly, for my application
>(nature/wildlife/landscape), I see no reason to own a brand new camera. I'm
>looking at buying full mechanical backups such as an MX but I have no need
>for program modes or autofocus.
>
>Christian Skofteland
>System Administrator
>ServerVault Inc.
>"Securing the Internet"
>(703)373-5971 (Direct)
>(703)333-5900 (Main)
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
