I didn't assume. It was an expressed *hope* that they don't, based on historical precedent. And I stand by it.
You perceive that as negativity as opposed to just expressing a wish? Tom C. >From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:45:39 -0400 > >And started off by saying that you assumed Pentax would make several >lower-spec versions and that that was a bad thing. > >-Adam > > >Tom C wrote: > > Are you sure you thought out what you just wrote? > > > > I haven't expressed anything negative about the K10D (except my wish to > > still be able to use off-the-shelf batteries). To the contrary I >expressed > > that the camera was desirable and that I hope Pentax continues down this > > path. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:20:53 -0400 > >> > >>Tom, > >> > >>You've got a funny way of being honest. Always looking at the bad side > >>first is negativity, not honesty. > >> > >>-Adam > >> > >> > >> > >>Tom C wrote: > >> > >>>It's typical of many in this group to perceive honesty as negativity >and > >>>criticism. Pentax is not my religion. You have expressed exactly my > >>>sentiments. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Tom C. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >>>>Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >>>>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:57:04 -0700 (PDT) > >>>> > >>>>The K10D may be all I'll ever 'need', but, like Tom, I'd still like to > >>>>see Pentax continue to build on this upgrade and the new level of > >>>>respect it will likely realize. > >>>> > >>>>Jack > >>>> > >>>>--- John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for > >>>>>years > >>>>>(from any manufacturer), and Tom is struggling to find something > >>>>>negative > >>>>>to say. > >>>>> > >>>>>But he'll be back on form soon enough, I'm sure. > >>>>> > >>>>>And in due course he'll buy one, and then won't stop telling people > >>>>>how > >>>>>good Pentax cameras are, and how he always liked them, and never lost > >>>>> > >>>>>faith, blah, blah, blah. > >>>>> > >>>>>It was ever thus. > >>>>> > >>>>>John > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:55:55 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi > >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Tom C wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more than twice and > >>>>>>>concentrate > >>>>>>>on being forward looking... > >>>>>> > >>>>>>I can't figure out what you mean. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Godfrey > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>-- > >>>>>Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>-- > >>>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>>PDML@pdml.net > >>>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>__________________________________________________ > >>>>Do You Yahoo!? > >>>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >>>>http://mail.yahoo.com > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>PDML@pdml.net > >>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>PDML@pdml.net > >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
