Christian wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >>I process some RAW files for one of my colleagues. The ISO 800 pics >>from her Canon 20D are noticeably more noisy than the 800ISO pics >>from my *istD. However, I too expect the 10D to be better than both. >>Paul > > > I own(ed) both an *ist D and a 20D and processed 1000s of pictures from > each. Hundreds from each at ISO 800 and above, and I can say with great > confidence thatt the 20D kicks the *ist D's butt with noise performance > at all levels. The 10D is better than the *ist D but worse than the 20D > based on my observations. >
Oops I realize now when you said "10D" you meant K10D (thought you meant Canon 10D) My bad. I expect the K10D to have better noise performance than the 20D and 6MP *ist derivatives. -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net