Christian wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> 
>>I process some RAW files for one of my colleagues. The ISO 800 pics  
>>from her Canon 20D are noticeably more noisy than the 800ISO pics  
>>from my *istD. However, I too expect the 10D to be better than both.
>>Paul
> 
> 
> I own(ed) both an *ist D and a 20D and processed 1000s of pictures from 
> each.  Hundreds from each at ISO 800 and above, and I can say with great 
> confidence thatt the 20D kicks the *ist D's butt with noise performance 
> at all levels.  The 10D is better than the *ist D but worse than the 20D 
> based on my observations.
> 

Oops I realize now when you said "10D" you meant K10D (thought you meant 
Canon 10D) My bad.  I expect the K10D to have better noise performance 
than the 20D and 6MP *ist derivatives.

-- 

Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to