FWIW: I had both the K20/4 and the M20/4 at the same time For a while. I did extensive tests and I couldn't Find any differences (on fine grain film) so I sold The M because I like the feel of the K better, its Certainly no beast, slightly bigger (longer)than say a 50mm/1.4. Tbe M was too small for me, the focus ring too being so thin. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Collin R Brendemuehl Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 7:50 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: OT: Bummer At 06:40 PM 9/16/2006, you wrote: >Message: 5 >Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:22:24 +0100 >From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: OT: Bummer >To: "pentax list" <PDML@pdml.net> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > >On 16/9/06, Collin R Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >I came close last night, but just missed it. > >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? > >ViewItem&ih=002&item=120029822978&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEDW%3AIT&rd=1 > >That wide a 20mm f4 ? The old K is a big beast, like the K35/2. I got to see one last year in Dayton at the ham radio gathering. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://www.brendemuehl.net http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
