The issue is being confused here. Taking a photograph and publishing a photograph are two different acts. See: http://www.kantor.com/useful/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf (or http://tinyurl.com/guwr6 )
read: http://www.amazon.com/Legal-Handbook-Photographers-Liabilities-Making/dp/158428059X ( http://tinyurl.com/k2v2o ) and keep on you: http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf ( http://tinyurl.com/cr8ao ) Cheers, paul <snip> Ann Sanfedele wrote: > NOT true, Adam - > If I took a picture on the street, sent it to my stock > agency and they sold it to someone > for an ad, the stock agency could easily get sued. </snip> <snip> >Adam Maas wrote: >> You are right that they have every right to object (Part of the entire >> 'Freedom of Speech' thing) although there is no concordant requirement >> for the Photographer to respect that objection beyond courtesy. </snip> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
