As another Nikon guy, I suspect you'll be happy. I'm quite fond of my K100D (And am drooling over the 21). I definitely prefer the Pentax DSLR's to the equivalent Nikon models, while I got great results with the D50, it was never the joy to use that the *istD and K100D are (even if I did trip over the *istD's buffer on occasion).
-Adam Michael Abbott wrote: > Thanks guys. > > I just bought one (well, ordered) from B&H, excited. K100D + 21/3.2. > It's perhaps a good thing that both the 43mm and 50mm are out of > stock, as I might have been tempted, with rebates and all. > > The first new camera I've ever bought, now that I think about it, as > well as my first non-Nikon. Will let y'alls know how it goes... > > Michael > > > On 02/10/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My A20 is noticeably worse than the 21mm. >> >> DagT >> > On 02/10/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think the simpler line of the curb in this one will give you a >> better idea of how much barrel distortion the DA21 has.. >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/26.htm >> >> I only had an FA20/2.8 for testing for a short while, and that was >> over a year ago. When I get home I can dredge up some exposures, if I >> saved them. But I don't recall it as being as good as the DA14. >> >> Godfrey >> >> On Oct 2, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Michael Abbott wrote: >> >>> Godfrey, >>> >>> I had some horizontal keystoning dialed in as well as the barrel >>> distortion. Looking at just the top line of bricks, I thought I saw >>> some moustache distortion after removing 2.6 )I think!) of barrel. >>> (This is in CS2). But you're right, it could just be a slightly wonky >>> wall. >>> >>> Do you have any idea how the 20/2.8 does? Bigger but not huge, and the >>> same price. >>> >>> Michael >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
