I'll soon, hopefully, be in a position to tell myself the same thing.
Have fantasy shopped for a scanner for quite awhile.
That pressure has recently lifted. WHEW!!

Jack

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Yes, I see what you're saying. Those highlights are probably the
> result of my pushing the curve to eliminate muddiness. I'd love to
> have a Nikon Coolscan 8000. They're much less expensive than they
> once were, but I just don't shoot enough film to justify it.
> Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > There are obvious areas where highlights could not be controlled,
> > you're absolutely right. I was looking more at skin tones and hair,
> on
> > the guitarist, for example. 
> > I found the high contrast Kodak UC highlights very difficult to
> > control. I also, wanted to acknowledge the problem you may have
> been
> > referencing with your "scanner" comment.
> > 
> > Jack
> > 
> > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > The shots have some blown highlights because there are some
> > > peripheral 
> > > areas in direct sun, for example in the background of the pic
> with
> > > the 
> > > pumpkins.  But the main light is provided by the flash and
> softbox,
> > > so 
> > > the exposure had to be based on those. Any film or digital would
> show
> > > 
> > > some blown highlights here.
> > > Paul
> > > On Oct 2, 2006, at 11:36 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Paul,
> > > > Thanks for the look. Generally crisp and well composed, but
> > > contrast
> > > > seems a problem. Maybe it's due to the scanner you want to
> replace
> > > or
> > > > the VC version of Portra. Hot emulsions has blown highlights
> for me
> > > to
> > > > the point where I usually increased the ISO by about a third of
> a
> > > stop.
> > > >
> > > > Jack
> > > >
> > > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I did as I had threatened, and shot a couple of rolls of
> Portra VC
> > > >> 160
> > > >> at the local Farmer's Market. I used the 6x7 with the 165/4
> Leaf
> > > >> Shutter lens and the AF 400T flash with a Lumiquest Softbox. I
> > > like
> > > >> the
> > > >> fill from the softbox, particularly in the shot of the kids
> > > sitting
> > > >> on
> > > >> the wall with the hard midday crosslight. Nothing special
> here,
> > > but I
> > > >>
> > > >> had a good time, and I like the performance of that lens. The
> negs
> > > >> look
> > > >> great under a loupe.  If I were to continue with medium
> format, I
> > > >> would
> > > >> want a better film scanner. I'm still using the Epson Photo
> 3200
> > > >> flatbed. It's marginal.
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5027776&size=lg
> > > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5027772
> > > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5027701&size=lg
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -- 
> > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > >> PDML@pdml.net
> > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > -- 
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to