The point is not whether the lighting was flat or not. The point is that's the way the lighting was. I'm not God and am cannot control the Sun or the weather or the seasons. The flatness actually enhanced the photo and made it a better, more artful photograph, in my opinion.
Tom C. >From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Flat or punchy >Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:38:50 +0100 (BST) > >On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Tom C wrote: > > > Others have thought that lighting was too flat when that's exactly the >way > > the lighting was, and hence the photo was very close to what I saw with >my > > eyes. > >So they were right, it was flat, yes? > >Kostas > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
