No, AE lock is an optional part IN ADDITON to true AE not a total
replacement for true AE.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam Maas
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 6:26 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: k10d and manual-aperture lenses?

You want cntinuous AE.Locked AE and Continuous AE are both AE.

-Adam


J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> LOCKED AE isnt AE its LOCKED AE.
> I want AE in addition to LOCKED AE.
> Simple enough concept for you?
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 5:56 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: k10d and manual-aperture lenses?
> 
> AE is AE.
> 
> There are different kinds, but the fact it isn't continuous doesn't
mean
> 
> it's not AE. It's just not the kind you want.
> 
> -Adam
> 
> 
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>> Yes, READ or delete. But don't argue
>> That LOCKED AE is AE when it isn't.
>> that's not semantics, that's major functional
>> differences. If it didn't matter, Pentax
>> Wouldn't have put the aperture cams on the lenses
>> in the first place back in '75. ( '71 if you
>> count the SMCT Pentax screw lenses).
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
>> William Robb
>> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 5:31 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: k10d and manual-aperture lenses?
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "J. C. O'Connell"
>> Subject: RE: k10d and manual-aperture lenses?
>>
>>
>> No automatic exposure has traditional always been
>> Continous after setting one parameter ( in this
>> Case the aperture ). This is simply a 1 shot
>> Stop down manual exposure mode where the camera
>> Finds the correct shutter speed for you ONE TIME
>> And doesn't correct if the lighting or aperture
>> Changes like traditional AE always has. Its not
>> Really AE its metered manual or "AE with AE LOCK
>> Always ON" which is quite another story.
>>
>> Is there a point, other than a semantics debate, to all this?
>>
>> William Robb 
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to