That's pretty much it. I'd rather see an aperture simulator, and would even pay a mild price increase for it. But I'm also damned glad that they gave us something, unlike Nikon (Who expects you to buy a $1699 body if you want that).
-Adam Who also has a LOT of Nikon gear, mostly AI/AI-S Vic MacBournie wrote: > I think we have to give JCO points for being so passionate and not > backing down from his position. I think he's argued the point so > vehemently that at this point he can't believe most people don't > outright agree with him. What he does not seem to realize is that we > all agree with him but are not willing to forego shooting digital > because of the minor inconvenience it brings. JCO I think very few > people are arguing with you about whether you are right or wrong, they > just don't think it's worth giving up on Pentax digital as a result. If > I were you and I loved those old lenses so much, I would stock up on > LXs and MZS's and get myself a good slide and negative scanner. Voila - > full support cameras and digital to boot. > By the way that's exactly what I have done. Problem is i still use the > istD 90 per cent of the time... > Vic > > > On 9-Oct-06, at 4:12 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >> Go about it. I NEVER do any personal attacks unless >> Someone personally attacks me first. Youre probably >> Mistaking my verbal abuse as "first strikes" when >> They are not. >> jco >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
