And using your logic, they should have dropped "K" support When "M" lenses came out and dropped K/M support when "A" Lenses came out and dropped "A" lens support when "F" lenses Came out etc etc etc. They never did this. Dropping K/M Support completely from the lineup at almost zero cost Saving is not good thing to happen and IMHO seriously Lowers the trustworthiness of the company and its long Term usuabliity of any of their products. Its like A manufactor produced time bomb. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:44 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > Simply logic would dictate that the more K/M lenses you own > The more damage is done by not having full support of them. > A single $5 part missing in the body could cause lose of functions > To THOUSANDS of $$$ worth of lenses. That's the really stupid > Economics of it all. Stupid economics for people who have bought a bunch of old lenses. Not so stupid for a company that is in the business of selling new equipment, especially new lenses. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
