Note I never said off-list. Off Topic posts are certainly allowed here. Just don't read them if you don't want to hear about it.
-Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Good, that means offlist ! > Bill, meet Adam, Adam meet Bill. Good luck. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:32 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux Now in Digest > modetosave bandwidth. > > Then don't, and Bill and I will talk FD amongst ourselves. > > -Adam > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> I don't want to discuss FD/FL anymore as its not >> Relevant as I have explained already about 10 times. >> READ section #2 of my post. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of >> Adam Maas >> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:55 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux Now in Digest >> modeto save bandwidth. >> >> 1. Only one body, and it was the cheapest. They killed the F1 and the >> T90, T80 and T70 off almost immediately after the EOS introduction. >> Can't sell what you don't make. >> >> -Adam >> >> >> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>> 1. They did leave FD bodies in production for a few years >>> ( most likely sales fell off so it wasn't economically feasable) >>> 2. I have said this over and over again - CANON USERS GOT >>> A NEW AND IMPROVED MOUNT when EOS came out - THERE IS NO NEW AND >>> IMPROVED MOUNT on the current pentax DSLR bodies. You are an >>> Idiot if you cant understand this simple fundamental difference >>> Between what happened with Canon and what happened with pentax >>> DSLRS. >>> jco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of >>> William Robb >>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:29 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey,part Deaux Now in Digest >> mode >>> to save bandwidth. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "J. C. O'Connell" >>> Subject: RE: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux >>> >>> >>>> This is stupid enough to drop. >>>> Anyone over 6 yrs old could easily understand what I implied >>>> In the post. You are just aruing to argue. >>> You need to post consice thoughts in a consice and understandable >> manner >>> if you want to be understood. I can't be made responsible for >>> misunderstanding your vague drivel. >>> >>> >>>> Brilliant post, it just adds so much to the discussion. >>>> Next time, try to post something meaningful, huh? >>> You too. >>> >>>> FD/EOS is a stupid analogy because it's the WRONG >>>> Analogy. Cant you understand the difference between >>>> Incompatability and lack of support of something >>>> That isnt incompatble? Obviously not or you wouldn't >>>> Be going on and on about Canon FD/EOS mounts. >>> It's a good analogy in that it highlites one company who completely >>> screwed their user base by dropping support for millions of lenses. >>> There was nothing to stop Canon from either making the EOS cameras >>> adaptable to the FD lenses, or leaving a couple of FD mount bodies in > >>> production. >>> Nothing except corporate greed, anyway. >>> >>> >>> William Robb >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
