Not all that well, they're even further behind in producing a high mp
replacement for their original pro/flagship model than Pentax is. Rumor
is that they're having noise problems with that little sensor that are
un-acceptable on a Pro body when they try to pack it with 10mp or more.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, William Robb wrote:
>
>
>
>>From: "Digital Image Studio"
>>Subject: Re: Thoughts on the digital format. Re: The JCO survey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On 14/10/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Then the legacy will be a register distance that was designed to
>>>accommodate 35mm FF image area and lenses that mos likely aren't
>>>optimal for the APS DSLR format. IE one big compromise. What I'm
>>>interested to see is how the manufacturers will sell the next gen
>>>cameras give than in all reality APS sized sensors are at 12MP IOW as
>>>dense as is practical WRT lens technology and minimum photo site size.
>>>Should be interesting.
>>>
>>>
>>By rights, they should have introduced a whole new lens line with a
>>shorter register difference. I imagine that they both knew how that
>>would have gone over with the present user base, and didn't have the
>>financial resources to do it.
>>A compromise on several levels.
>>
>>
>
>Didn't Olympus do that with the 4/3? How are they doing?
>
>Kostas
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
