The aperture simulator is there to support the aperture ring. The 645 lens mount is electro-mechanically equivalent of a KFA lens mount. Pentax could then use exactly the same electronics in the 645 and all of their 35mm cameras, a significant cost savings. I expect that the 645D will no longer support the aperture ring but will change the aperture from the camera body. But who knows.
Lucas Rijnders (Privé) wrote: >Op Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:56:57 +0200 schreef frank theriault ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>On 10/11/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>I think I'll go buy all the used 645 glass. ;-) >>> >>> >>Will the 645D have an aperture simulator? ;-) >> >> > >I know you were kidding, but I actually looked at a 645 and A-lens: they >do appear to have the same setup as the Ka-mount, including the aperture >actuator and (redundant?) aperture simulator. Why is it there? Solely to >support 6x7 lenses? > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net