On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Adam Maas wrote:

> I'd agree on the FM-D, even better would be a FM2-D, with the FM2's
> slightly larger size and better finder.

I used the term "FM" to indicate the Nikon FM, FM2, FE2 and FM3a  
bodies. The FM, FM2, FE2 were exactly the same size, as I recall ...  
I had both ... and used the same accessories (MD11 and MD12 motors,  
finder bits, etc). The shape of the prism housing varied just the  
slightest bit between them, that's all.

Godfrey



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to