John, do you talk to people like this face to face? The anonymity & security of insulting people over the internet is so much easier than doing it face to face. Less risk of a black eye.
Being direct is one thing, but unwarranted name calling is just childish. Dave On 10/22/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not so quick you big dummy. He, by his own admission > Said he really liked the automation his newer lenses > Provide. Well, well, well, if he likes automation, its > Pretty stupid to say its of no consequence or important > To have the K/M automation features removed. If he > Doesn't care about the very things he says he likes alot, that > Makes him QUITE illogical by any standards. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Keith McGuinness > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 8:26 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > It's not an either/or proposition. I can shoot any way I please, and > get > > pleasure of varying degrees from whatever my choice is. Of course, > you're > > so blinded by what you perceive as being the one and only way of doing > > things, you can't understand that. > > Of course! > > And I agreed with Shel's original post on how he shoots with the > various lenses. > > His point was, simply, that because of the way he shoots, the > loss of the aperture thingy is of little consequence. > > THAT argument is simple and perfectly logical. > > Suggesting that the way the he shoots is illogical is beside the > point. He can use his camera and lenses any way he likes to get > the pictures he wants. If it works for him, then that's the end > of that argument. > > Keith McG -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
