I read somewhere (never could test it myself) that it is as you would
expect from Sigma: very soft wide open, quite good with smaller
apertures but then why pay so much for f/1.4 ?

YMMV

2006/10/24, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's a lot more expensive but a LOT smaller and lighter than their 28/1.8.
> 62mm vs 77mm filter size.
> It's the hugeness of the 28 that's kept me away.
> Please let us know what the results are like.
> It would be hard to justify when I own the wonderful FA35/2 though.
>
> Don
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > Godfrey DiGiorgi
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:18 PM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: Anyone checked this out yet?
> >
> >
> > Friend of mine bought one. It's huge and heavy.
> > Haven't seen any results with it yet.
> >
> > G
> >
> > On Oct 23, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
> >
> > > Sigma 30/1.4 for Pentax!
> > > http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
> > > O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=433041&is=REG&addedTroughType=search
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>



-- 

Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to