I read somewhere (never could test it myself) that it is as you would expect from Sigma: very soft wide open, quite good with smaller apertures but then why pay so much for f/1.4 ?
YMMV 2006/10/24, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's a lot more expensive but a LOT smaller and lighter than their 28/1.8. > 62mm vs 77mm filter size. > It's the hugeness of the 28 that's kept me away. > Please let us know what the results are like. > It would be hard to justify when I own the wonderful FA35/2 though. > > Don > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Godfrey DiGiorgi > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:18 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: Anyone checked this out yet? > > > > > > Friend of mine bought one. It's huge and heavy. > > Haven't seen any results with it yet. > > > > G > > > > On Oct 23, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote: > > > > > Sigma 30/1.4 for Pentax! > > > http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? > > > O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=433041&is=REG&addedTroughType=search > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net