My initial take is that it's slightly better than the *istD at 1600. Paul On Nov 24, 2006, at 11:42 AM, David Savage wrote:
> Sweet moment. > > I though the K10D was supposed to have noise issues? ;-) > > Dave > > On 11/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is just a family snap, but I thought it might interest the >> group. It's cropped to about 70% of the frame and was shot at ISO >> 1600 in very low light. The exposure was f2.8 @ 1/15th. The lens was >> the 35/2. Shake reduction did its job. >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5247870&size=lg >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
