> > 
> > The World Trade Centre was also built to withstand the impact of a
> > commercial airliner.
> 
> Which it did.  The problem wasn't the impact of the aircraft - it
was
> the prolongued heat from the fires caused by the large load of fuel.
> 

Precisely. They never planned for that when they designed it. All
sorts of things can happen which people, even the clever people who
design nuclear reactors, cannot plan for. So to claim that they are
safe just because they can withstand the impact of an aircraft is
hubristic, and sounds very much like the claim that Titanic was
unsinkable.  

Regards
Bob


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to