Hmmm.... I had thought that CF II always meant microdrive. What would be the reasoning for making a non micro-drive CF II device?
Tom C. >From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Somewhat OT - Compact Flash type II >Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:49:17 -0500 > >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:04:41PM -0700, Tom C wrote: > > Hitachi 4GB and 2-IBM 1GB's. I agree, if the Seagate, has problems... > > > > I see at Tiger Direct they have Transcend 4GB Flash Type I for around >$80. > > They have Crucial (Lexar) 4GB Type I for $78 and 2GB for $38. > > > > I would definitely by a Type I if the price is the same. > > > > Tom C. > >Tom - you appear to be confusing CF type (based on physical dimensions) >with the underlying media type. > >All microdrives are CF II, but not all CF II devices are microdrives. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
