Taking this a bit further... Does this mean that Britney Spears' 1999 music video for "Baby One More Time" is pornographic? Wasn't she 17 (a minor) when that video was shot? Are the director and crew of that video, a montage of dance in a high school with Spears dressed in a provocative school girl oufit, now to be considered pornographers?
Whatever... The DOJ is obviously misguided here. -Brendan --- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Be sure to click on the Google and Archive.org links > on the first > page to see the actual "pornographic" photos. > > http://images.google.com/images?q=%22webe%20web%22 > > http://web.archive.org/web/20050411170128/www.bsmmodeling.com/115.html > > This ought to be one big joke, but I'm sure nobody > in the > prosecutor's office is laughing. I'm just sick and > tired of this > nonsense from our government. They're making this > country a laughing > stock to the rest of the world. > > Bob > > On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > > > Our very own Taliban in the Department of Justice. > > > > Rick > > > > --- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I find this very depressing: > >> > >> http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6139524.html > >> > >> Bob > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
